Harvard University rejected demands from the Trump administration, stating that acquiescing would compromise its institutional control and surrender to a government that is critical of what it perceives as a liberal bias in universities. This defiance has resulted in a freeze on $2.3 billion in federal funding.
The freeze is part of a review of Harvard’s $9 billion in federal contracts and grants, which is linked to a broader initiative aimed at combating alleged antisemitism on campuses during pro-Palestinian protests. The Department of Education accused Harvard of exhibiting a “troubling entitlement mindset,” asserting that receiving federal funds requires adherence to civil rights laws.
This situation has intensified the conflict between the Trump administration and elite universities, raising concerns about academic freedom. The administration has suspended funding for several universities, demanding policy changes and accusing them of neglecting to address antisemitism. Additionally, foreign students involved in protests have faced deportation proceedings and visa cancellations.
Harvard President Alan Garber contended that the administration’s demands would allow for federal control, thus undermining the university’s independence. He stated that no government should dictate academic content or admissions processes. The administration’s goal is to “Make Higher Education Great Again” by addressing antisemitism and ensuring that taxpayer funds are not used to support discrimination.
The Education Department has required Harvard to limit the influence of activists, conduct an external audit on “viewpoint diversity,” and eliminate race-based admissions by August. It has also mandated screening and reporting of international students. In response, Harvard professors have filed lawsuits to block the $9 billion review. A similar lawsuit has emerged at Columbia University, which is facing a $400 million funding freeze. There are reports of a possible consent decree for Columbia.
Garber has called these demands an infringement on First Amendment rights, insisting that Harvard will not compromise its independence. While he acknowledges the importance of addressing antisemitism, he argues against government overreach. Previously, Harvard agreed to enhance protections for Jewish students in a settlement. To alleviate potential financial impacts from the funding freeze, Harvard plans to borrow $750 million.