President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that the United States plans to “take over” the Gaza Strip, possibly deploying American troops, in a controversial move that could reshape the Middle East. During a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump described his vision for Gaza as a “Riviera,” suggesting that Palestinians living there should relocate.
“The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip and do a job with it too,” Trump declared. He stressed the necessity of clearing unexploded ordnance and rebuilding the region, pointing out that he considers a lasting U.S. presence to be a stabilizing factor in the Middle East. When asked about the possibility for sending U.S. troops, he did not rule it out, stating, “If it’s needed, we will pursue that course.” This remark from Trump suggests a shift in U.S. policy as he has earlier condemned long-term American engagement in the Middle East, but now indicates a big commitment. His statement brings up legal and financial issues about the viability of the plan and its possible impacts in the area.
Trump proposed that Palestinians ought not to go back to Gaza, claiming that the area is unlivable. He proposed relocating them to a “good, fresh, beautiful piece of land” elsewhere in the Middle East. However, neighboring nations, including Egypt and Jordan, have rejected absorbing additional Palestinian refugees, fearing instability.
The reaction to Trump’s statements has been mixed. Two Arab officials expressed confusion and concern, warning of the potential impact on regional stability. One official described the comments as “hard to grasp and digest,” while another cautioned that the proposal could jeopardize the fragile ceasefire in Gaza. Saudi Arabia, a key player in regional diplomacy, is unlikely to pursue peace under these circumstances.
Even in the U.S., Trump’s remarks drew skepticism from lawmakers, including some within his own party. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) remarked, “I think most South Carolinians would probably not be excited about sending Americans to take over Gaza.”
Hamas has shown no intention to engage in negotiations following Trump’s announcement. The president reiterated his dedication to obtaining the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza, cautioning of a stronger U.S. reaction if they are not liberated.
Trump’s proposal also complicates broader regional negotiations. The former Biden administration had been working toward a normalization agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia, contingent on a Palestinian state. Trump’s stance could derail these diplomatic efforts.
Netanyahu, appearing supportive of Trump’s vision, used the press conference to bolster his standing. Nonetheless, the relationship between the two leaders has been complex. Trump had previously criticized Netanyahu for congratulating Joe Biden on his 2020 election win, labeling it a disloyal action. Despite past tensions, Tuesday’s remarks suggested a renewed alignment between them.
Netanyahu is expected to remain in Washington for further meetings, including discussions on Capitol Hill. As the world reacts to Trump’s bold declaration, the fate of Gaza and its people remains uncertain.